Patients are searching for this trial right now

This page is already ranking on Google. Activate it to start receiving pre-qualified patient leads directly in your inbox.

14-day free trial · $44/mo after · Cancel anytime · Money-back guarantee

NCT05294042 · University of Illinois at Chicago

Patient Navigators for Children's Community Mental Health Services in High Poverty Urban Communities

What this study is about

The purpose is to study a model of mental health navigation for African American and Latinx children (0-14 years) in high poverty urban communities focused on reducing key parental attitudinal barriers to care.

View original scientific description

The purpose is to study a model of mental health navigation for African American and Latinx children (0-14 years) in high poverty urban communities focused on reducing key parental attitudinal barriers to care. Reducing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in children's mental health is a national priority and patient navigation is a highly promising approach that is rarely used in children's mental health services. The study will examine the effectiveness of paraprofessional (PP) navigators who have strong community knowledge and waitlist as usual condition (active wailt list \[AWL\]. The study will examine specific mechanisms of navigator effectiveness in children's mental health and compare an AWL to provide a rigorous test of the proposed mechanisms. The knowledge gained from this application may be important to reducing disparities and employing the workforce best suited to navigation in the community mental health system. Two community boards, one focused on identifying factors important to supporting navigators at the agencies (Implementation and Sustainability Community Board) will meet quarterly, and the other focused on implications for state and federal policy (Public Policy Board), will meet annually.

Interventions

OTHER

Navigation

The intervention in this study is a model of navigation for families seeking services at the two mental health agencies collaborating on this study. Navigators will implement a model of navigation with caregivers focused on reducing logistical and attitudinal barriers to care.

Primary outcome measures

Initiation of services by caregiver

Time frame: Up to 18 months

Investigators will calculate time elapsed between assignment to condition and first session of recommended services and solicit navigator and caregiver report

Attendance in services; navigator and caregiver report

Time frame: 18 months

Number of times attended services; endorsement of service engagement

Change from Baseline Measure of Perceived Homophily at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(McCroskey, Richmond, \& Daley, 1975).The Measure of Perceived Homophily is a 16-item, four-factor continuous measure of an individual's perceived similarity and dissimilarity of another individual. This measure will be used to determine how similar the caregiver perceives their navigator on the four dimensions. The four dimensions include: Attitude, Background, Value, and Appearance. Each dimension includes 4 items, which are rated from 1 to 7 (e.g., 1 = Doesn't think like me to 7 = Thinks like me). Cronbach's α ranges from .51 to .93 (McCroskey et al., 2006)

Change from Baseline Social Network Assessment of Boundary Spanning at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(Marsden, 2011). Caregivers will be asked two questions at each assessment time point to determine sources of influence on services recommended by providers: 1) "Has your provider recommended services or practices to help with your child's mental health or family needs?If yes, please name them" and for each service or practice named by the caregiver, 2) Did you talk with anyone besides your provider about the service or practice? If yes, please indicate who you talked to about this service or practice. These questions will allow us to assess whether navigators are serving as a boundary spanner. Specifically, at each time point, we will calculate the proportion of services or practices recommended by the provider that were also discussed with the navigator.

Change from Baseline Norbeck Social Support at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(NSSQ; Norbeck et al., 1983). The NSSQ examines multiple components of caregiver social support. The Total Network Support Subscale (3 items) is the sum of the total number of members (up to 24) parents identify in their support network, frequency of contact with each member (1= once a year or less to 5 = daily), and length of the relationship with each member on a 5 point-scale (1 = less than 6 months to 5 = more than 5 years). The Total Functional Support Subscale (6 items) measures the sum of perceived affective/emotional (n = 4 items) and instrumental/tangible support (n = 2 items; 0 = not at all to 4 = a great deal). In addition, the NSSQ will also be used to examine the extent to which navigators provided context-relevant social support to caregivers. Scores range from 0 (not named or named but no support) to 24 (maximum support).

Change from Baseline Parental Attitudes Toward Psychological Services at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(PATPSI; Turner, 2012). This scale is a 26-item scale that assesses parental attitudes toward outpatient mental health services across three domains: Help-seeking attitudes, help-seeking intentions, and mental health stigma. Items are rated from 0 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The PATPSI has demonstrated discriminant validity as well as adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranging from .72 to .92) and test-retest reliability (Pearson r ranging from .66 to .82).

Change from Baseline Family Empowerment at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Rodriguez et al., 201 The adapted version of the original FES was designed to assess empowerment for families whose children have emotional disabilities (Rodriguez et al., 011). It consists of 34 items and three subscales: Family Empowerment (the ability to manage day-to-day life of the family, 12 items), Service System Empowerment (the caregiver's sense of ability to interact with the services system to obtain needed services,12 items), and Community/Political Empowerment (the caregiver's sense of ability to advocate for improved services, 10 items). Each subscales' internal consistency is high with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from .87 to .88. Test-retest reliability is also high, ranging from .77-.85 (Koren et al. 1992), with high alpha reliability for the adapted version (.94; Rodriguez et al., 2011).

Change from Baseline Vanderbilt Mental Health Self Efficacy at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(Bickmanet al., 1991) This measure consists of 25 items measuring parents' self-efficacy beliefs and behavior expectations about mental health treatment for their children on a 5-point scale (1=strongly agree, 5=strongly disagree). The questionnaire has been used with both normative and high-risk samples with high internal consistency (alpha=.93 for normative and high-risk samples; Godwin, 2004). Construct validity has been established, with higher scores related to more parent collaboration with providers, increased social support, and more mental health service knowledge (Bickmanet al., 1998).

Change from Baseline Barriers to Treatment Participation at 6,12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(BTPS; Kazdinet al. 1997). This measure is a 44-item scale that is administered via caregiver interview assessing barriers to participation in children's treatment. Items are rated from 1 (never a problem) to 5 (very often a problem), measuring four different areas: stressors or obstacles that compete with treatment, treatment demands, perceived relevance of treatment, and relationship with the therapist, with high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .86; Nock \& Photos, 2006)

Change from Baseline PROMIS Global Health Scale at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(Broderick et al., 2013).This 10-item self-report scale was developed to evaluate individuals' perceptions of overall health status and its impact on quality of life (Hays et al., 2009). The scale produces two subscale scores: Physical Health (GPH) and Mental Health (GMH). Items are reported on a Likert scale of 1 to 5, with the exception of an overall pain scale, which is rated from 1 (No pain) to 10 (Worst pain). Each scale has high internal consistency (GMH: alpha=.86, GPH: alpha=.81), and high convergent validity with other measures of health-related quality of life (Hays et al, 2009).

Change from Baseline OHIO Scales at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(Ogles et al., 2001) The OHIO scales isa broad measure of functioning for youth age 5 to 18 years. It includes two subscales addressing (a) problem areas (α = .86) and (b) positive areasof functioning (α = .91). Each subscale contains 20 items. There is a parent report and a clinician report. We will utilize the Functioning subscale.

Change from Baseline Strength and Difficulties at 6, 12, and 18 months

Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

(SDQ, Goodman, 2001). Caregivers will complete the SDQ at baseline to derive three scores of child symptoms: symptom severity, externalizing difficulties, and internalizing difficulties. The SDQ is a 25-item screening tool for youth ages 3-17. The response scale has three anchors (0 = Not true, 1 = Somewhat true, and 2 = Certainly true). Internal consistency for the parent report total difficulties score is 0.8 and inter-rater agreement is 0.44 (Stone et al. 2010)

Demographics

Time frame: Baseline

Child age, gender, and ethnicity, as well as other demographics, will be reported by the caregiver via REDCap. Caregiver demographics will be collected by research assistants via REDCap.

Who can participate

This study lists these criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov. A study coordinator reviews eligibility during screening — this page does not determine whether you qualify.

Inclusion criteria

  • African American and Latinx Children between 0 and 14 years of age and their caregiver
  • New referrals on the waitlist for outpatient mental health services; families interested and engaged in social services from two state supported projects.
  • Have been screened and deemed appropriate for services at one of two social service participating community mental health agencies; or engaged in services via navigation projects

Where

  • Chicago, Illinois

Related conditions & keywords

Community Mental Health ServicesChild Mental Health ServicesRacial and Ethnic DisparitiesUrban PovertyNavigationParaprofessional

Frequently asked questions

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a research study that tests new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or procedures to determine their safety and effectiveness. Trials are carefully designed and monitored to protect participants while advancing medical knowledge.

Is it safe to participate?

Clinical trials follow strict safety guidelines and ethical standards. Trials must be reviewed and approved, and participants are closely monitored by medical professionals throughout the study. You can withdraw at any time if you choose.

Will I be compensated?

Many clinical trials offer compensation for your time, travel expenses, and inconvenience. The specific compensation varies by study and will be discussed during the screening process. All study-related medical care is typically provided at no cost to participants.

Will I receive a placebo instead of treatment?

When effective treatment exists, participants typically receive either the standard treatment plus the study intervention, or the standard treatment plus placebo. You would not be denied effective care. Placebos are primarily used when no proven treatment is available, or in addition to standard care. Your trial consent form will clearly explain what treatments you may receive.

Can I leave a trial if I change my mind?

Absolutely. Participation in clinical trials is completely voluntary. You have the right to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason, without penalty or loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled.

How long does a clinical trial last?

Trial duration varies widely depending on the study design and purpose. Some trials last just a few weeks, while others may continue for months or years. The study coordinator will provide specific timeline information during your screening call.

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov · synced Feb 21, 2025 · Source of record for eligibility and locations

📊
1 of 154 participants interested
1% interest

See if this study fits

A short prescreen based on this study's listed criteria. A coordinator confirms eligibility — this is not a medical assessment.

Preparing your pre-screening questions…

Study locations

Choose your preferred location, or select flexible during enrollment.

RECRUITING

Chicago

Illinois

Location available

Express your interest

Share your contact details and a study coordinator can follow up about screening.

Secure & Confidential

Your information is protected and will only be shared with the research team.

What participation can include

  • Study-related care provided by the research team
  • Close monitoring by medical professionals
  • Possible compensation for time and travel*
  • The option to withdraw at any time
  • Contributing to medical research that may help future patients

*Compensation varies by study. Confirm details with coordinator.

Typical next steps

  1. 1.Submit this form
  2. 2.Phone screening
  3. 3.In-person assessment if eligible
  4. 4.Begin participation

Find More Multiple Myeloma Trials by City

Browse all multiple myeloma clinical trials in these cities — not just this study.

Looking for Community Mental Health Services Treatment in Chicago?

Join others in Illinois exploring innovative treatment options through clinical research

Community Mental Health Services Treatment Options in Chicago, Illinois

If you're searching for Community Mental Health Services treatment in Chicago, participating in a clinical research study may provide access to innovative approaches under expert medical supervision. This study is actively recruiting participants in Chicago and surrounding areas.

Clinical trials offer participants the opportunity to receive cutting-edge treatments while contributing to medical research that may help future patients with Community Mental Health Services. All study-related care is provided at no cost to participants.

Local Sites
1 locations in Illinois
Now Enrolling
Up to 154 participants
Quick Start
Screening available now

Why Consider a Clinical Trial for Community Mental Health Services?

Potential Benefits

  • Access to new treatment approaches before public availability
  • Close monitoring by experienced medical professionals
  • Study-related care provided at no cost
  • Contribute to medical research for Community Mental Health Services

What to Expect

  • Initial screening to determine eligibility
  • Regular check-ups and monitoring visits
  • Possible compensation for time and travel
  • You can withdraw at any time

Frequently Asked Questions About This Community Mental Health Services Study

Important Clinical Trial Information

This information is provided for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial participation involves potential risks and benefits. Eligibility requirements apply and will be assessed during the screening process.

Study identifier: NCT05294042. For complete study details, visit ClinicalTrials.gov. Always consult with your healthcare provider before making decisions about your medical care or participating in clinical research.