NCT05763537 · University of Montana
Understanding the Role of Doulas in Supporting People With PMADs
What this study is about
Detailed Description The doula-led intervention developed during the first phase of this project will be pilot tested for feasibility. Following the recruitment procedures described in the recruitment and retention plan, approximately 75 participants will be enrolled into the study.
View original scientific description
Detailed Description The doula-led intervention developed during the first phase of this project will be pilot tested for feasibility. Following the recruitment procedures described in the recruitment and retention plan, approximately 75 participants will be enrolled into the study. Twenty-five of the participants will receive regular doula care and 25 of the participants will receive care from a doula trained in the PMAD doula training throughout their pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum time period, following the intervention procedures developed in Aim 2 of this study. Twenty-five women will not receive care from a doula and will receive perinatal care as usual. Women in all groups will take surveys via REDCap during their enrollment in the intervention, at 1 month postpartum, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum (at the conclusion of the intervention). All participants who receive the PMAD doula intervention will complete checklists after each session with their doula, to assess fidelity to the intervention. Participant communication with their doula via patient notebook will also be assessed for fidelity to the intervention.
Interventions
BEHAVIORAL
Standard Doula Care Plus PMAD Intervention
Doulas trained in the DONA training, and the PMAD-focused training will provide care to perinatal people.
BEHAVIORAL
Standard Doula Care
Doulas trained in the DONA training will provide care to perinatal people.
Primary outcome measures
The Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI)
Time frame: At study enrollment
The Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) is a 60-item self-report instrument that measures self-efficacy expectancies for coping with childbirth. In describing the development of the CBSEI, Lowe (1993) reports that the CBSEI scales have excellent internal consistency reliability (0.86 to 0.96) and factor analysis suggested that each CBSEl scale is unidimensional. Validity of the CBSEI was supported by significant positive correlations with the criterion variables of generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, and internal health locus of control; and significant negative correlations with external health locus of control and learned helplessness. Validity was also supported by significantly higher self-efficacy scores for multiparous as compared to nulliparous pregnant women.
Change in the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) at 1 month postpartum
Time frame: 1-month postpartum
The Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) is a 60-item self-report instrument that measures self-efficacy expectancies for coping with childbirth. In describing the development of the CBSEI, Lowe (1993) reports that the CBSEI scales have excellent internal consistency reliability (0.86 to 0.96) and factor analysis suggested that each CBSEl scale is unidimensional. Validity of the CBSEI was supported by significant positive correlations with the criterion variables of generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, and internal health locus of control; and significant negative correlations with external health locus of control and learned helplessness. Validity was also supported by significantly higher self-efficacy scores for multiparous as compared to nulliparous pregnant women.
Change in the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) at 3 months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months
The Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) is a 60-item self-report instrument that measures self-efficacy expectancies for coping with childbirth. In describing the development of the CBSEI, Lowe (1993) reports that the CBSEI scales have excellent internal consistency reliability (0.86 to 0.96) and factor analysis suggested that each CBSEl scale is unidimensional. Validity of the CBSEI was supported by significant positive correlations with the criterion variables of generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, and internal health locus of control; and significant negative correlations with external health locus of control and learned helplessness. Validity was also supported by significantly higher self-efficacy scores for multiparous as compared to nulliparous pregnant women.
Change in the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) at 6 months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory (CBSEI) is a 60-item self-report instrument that measures self-efficacy expectancies for coping with childbirth. In describing the development of the CBSEI, Lowe (1993) reports that the CBSEI scales have excellent internal consistency reliability (0.86 to 0.96) and factor analysis suggested that each CBSEl scale is unidimensional. Validity of the CBSEI was supported by significant positive correlations with the criterion variables of generalized self-efficacy, self-esteem, and internal health locus of control; and significant negative correlations with external health locus of control and learned helplessness. Validity was also supported by significantly higher self-efficacy scores for multiparous as compared to nulliparous pregnant women.
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE)
Time frame: At study enrollment
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) is a 17-item self-report instrument that measures perceived self-efficacy. Internal consistency reliability for the SGSE scale in organizational research has been moderate to high (alpha = .76 to .89) (e.g., Cable \& Judge, 1994; Earley \& Lituchy, 1991; Gardner \& Pierce, 1998; Riggs \& Knight, 1994; Schaubroeck \& Merritt, 1997; Smith \& Foti, 1998).
Change in the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: 1-month postpartum
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) is a 17-item self-report instrument that measures perceived self-efficacy. Internal consistency reliability for the SGSE scale in organizational research has been moderate to high (alpha = .76 to .89) (e.g., Cable \& Judge, 1994; Earley \& Lituchy, 1991; Gardner \& Pierce, 1998; Riggs \& Knight, 1994; Schaubroeck \& Merritt, 1997; Smith \& Foti, 1998).
Change in the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) is a 17-item self-report instrument that measures perceived self-efficacy. Internal consistency reliability for the SGSE scale in organizational research has been moderate to high (alpha = .76 to .89) (e.g., Cable \& Judge, 1994; Earley \& Lituchy, 1991; Gardner \& Pierce, 1998; Riggs \& Knight, 1994; Schaubroeck \& Merritt, 1997; Smith \& Foti, 1998).
Change in the General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (SGSE) is a 17-item self-report instrument that measures perceived self-efficacy. Internal consistency reliability for the SGSE scale in organizational research has been moderate to high (alpha = .76 to .89) (e.g., Cable \& Judge, 1994; Earley \& Lituchy, 1991; Gardner \& Pierce, 1998; Riggs \& Knight, 1994; Schaubroeck \& Merritt, 1997; Smith \& Foti, 1998).
Edinburgh Depression Scale
Time frame: At study enrollment
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report instrument that measures postnatal depression. A review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Depression Scale suggest the EPDS has high sensitivity and specificity (Eberhard-Gran et al., 2001). Other research supports its concurrent and predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of between .82-.84 (Bergink et al., 2011).
Change in the Edinburgh Depression Scale at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report instrument that measures postnatal depression. A review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Depression Scale suggest the EPDS has high sensitivity and specificity (Eberhard-Gran et al., 2001). Other research supports its concurrent and predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of between .82-.84 (Bergink et al., 2011).
Change in the Edinburgh Depression Scale at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report instrument that measures postnatal depression. A review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Depression Scale suggest the EPDS has high sensitivity and specificity (Eberhard-Gran et al., 2001). Other research supports its concurrent and predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of between .82-.84 (Bergink et al., 2011).
Change in Edinburgh Depression Scale at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a 10-item self-report instrument that measures postnatal depression. A review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Depression Scale suggest the EPDS has high sensitivity and specificity (Eberhard-Gran et al., 2001). Other research supports its concurrent and predictive validity and Cronbach's alpha of between .82-.84 (Bergink et al., 2011).
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9
Time frame: At study enrollment
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a 9-item self-report instrument that measures depression. The PHQ-9 has high criterion validity (.88 sensitivity, .88 specificity) and reliability of .86-.89 (Kroenke et al., 2021).
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire at 1-month postpartum (PHQ)-9
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a 9-item self-report instrument that measures depression. The PHQ-9 has high criterion validity (.88 sensitivity, .88 specificity) and reliability of .86-.89 (Kroenke et al., 2021).
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire at 3-months postpartum (PHQ)-9
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum.
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a 9-item self-report instrument that measures depression. The PHQ-9 has high criterion validity (.88 sensitivity, .88 specificity) and reliability of .86-.89 (Kroenke et al., 2021).
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire at 6-months postpartum (PHQ)-9
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 is a 9-item self-report instrument that measures depression. The PHQ-9 has high criterion validity (.88 sensitivity, .88 specificity) and reliability of .86-.89 (Kroenke et al., 2021).
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7
Time frame: At study enrollment
The GAD-7 screens for and is a symptom severity measure for four of the most common anxiety disorders. Spitzer et al.,(2006) describe strong support of the GAD-7: "Studies with the GAD indicate that the internal consistency of the GAD-7 is excellent (Cronbach α = .92). Test-retest reliability is also good (intraclass correlation = 0.83). Comparison of scores derived from the self-report scales with those derived from the MHP-administered versions of the same scales yielded similar results (intraclass correlation = 0.83), indicating good procedural validity. As the cut point increases, sensitivity decreases and specificity increases in a continuous fashion. At a cut point of 10 or greater, sensitivity and specificity exceed 0.80, and sensitivity is nearly maximized. The GAD-7 also has strong construct validity. There is a strong association between increasing GAD-7 severity scores and worsening function on all 6 SF-20 scales."
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The GAD-7 screens for and is a symptom severity measure for four of the most common anxiety disorders. Spitzer et al.,(2006) describe strong support of the GAD-7: "Studies with the GAD indicate that the internal consistency of the GAD-7 is excellent (Cronbach α = .92). Test-retest reliability is also good (intraclass correlation = 0.83). Comparison of scores derived from the self-report scales with those derived from the MHP-administered versions of the same scales yielded similar results (intraclass correlation = 0.83), indicating good procedural validity. As the cut point increases, sensitivity decreases and specificity increases in a continuous fashion. At a cut point of 10 or greater, sensitivity and specificity exceed 0.80, and sensitivity is nearly maximized. The GAD-7 also has strong construct validity. There is a strong association between increasing GAD-7 severity scores and worsening function on all 6 SF-20 scales."
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum.
The GAD-7 screens for and is a symptom severity measure for four of the most common anxiety disorders. Spitzer et al.,(2006) describe strong support of the GAD-7: "Studies with the GAD indicate that the internal consistency of the GAD-7 is excellent (Cronbach α = .92). Test-retest reliability is also good (intraclass correlation = 0.83). Comparison of scores derived from the self-report scales with those derived from the MHP-administered versions of the same scales yielded similar results (intraclass correlation = 0.83), indicating good procedural validity. As the cut point increases, sensitivity decreases and specificity increases in a continuous fashion. At a cut point of 10 or greater, sensitivity and specificity exceed 0.80, and sensitivity is nearly maximized. The GAD-7 also has strong construct validity. There is a strong association between increasing GAD-7 severity scores and worsening function on all 6 SF-20 scales."
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 at 6 months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The GAD-7 screens for and is a symptom severity measure for four of the most common anxiety disorders. Spitzer et al.,(2006) describe strong support of the GAD-7: "Studies with the GAD indicate that the internal consistency of the GAD-7 is excellent (Cronbach α = .92). Test-retest reliability is also good (intraclass correlation = 0.83). Comparison of scores derived from the self-report scales with those derived from the MHP-administered versions of the same scales yielded similar results (intraclass correlation = 0.83), indicating good procedural validity. As the cut point increases, sensitivity decreases and specificity increases in a continuous fashion. At a cut point of 10 or greater, sensitivity and specificity exceed 0.80, and sensitivity is nearly maximized. The GAD-7 also has strong construct validity. There is a strong association between increasing GAD-7 severity scores and worsening function on all 6 SF-20 scales."
Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time frame: At study enrollment
The MSPSS is a 12-item measure of perceived social support from three sources. Internal reliability of the MSPSS is strong using Cronbach's coefficient alphas (.91) (Dahlem et al., 1991).
Change in Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The MSPSS is a 12-item measure of perceived social support from three sources. Internal reliability of the MSPSS is strong using Cronbach's coefficient alphas (.91) (Dahlem et al., 1991).
Change in Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum.
The MSPSS is a 12-item measure of perceived social support from three sources. Internal reliability of the MSPSS is strong using Cronbach's coefficient alphas (.91) (Dahlem et al., 1991).
Change in Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The MSPSS is a 12-item measure of perceived social support from three sources. Internal reliability of the MSPSS is strong using Cronbach's coefficient alphas (.91) (Dahlem et al., 1991).
Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ)- Short Form
Time frame: At study enrollment
The SSQ-Short Form is a 6-item measure of social support that measures the number of people available to provide support in 6 different areas. The internal reliability of the short-version is high (.97-.98) (Sarason et al.,1987).
Change in Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ)- Short Form at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The SSQ-Short Form is a 6-item measure of social support that measures the number of people available to provide support in 6 different areas. The internal reliability of the short-version is high (.97-.98) (Sarason et al.,1987).
Change in Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ)- Short Form at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum.
The SSQ-Short Form is a 6-item measure of social support that measures the number of people available to provide support in 6 different areas. The internal reliability of the short-version is high (.97-.98) (Sarason et al.,1987).
Change in Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ)- Short Form at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The SSQ-Short Form is a 6-item measure of social support that measures the number of people available to provide support in 6 different areas. The internal reliability of the short-version is high (.97-.98) (Sarason et al.,1987).
Birth Companion Support Questionnaire
Time frame: 1-month postpartum
The BCSQ is comprised of 17-items to measure participants perception of lay birth companion support during labor. Research by Dunne et al., (2014) notes internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha is between .66-.76) and content and construct validity of the questionnaire (Dunne et al., 2014).
Change in Birth Companion Support Questionnaire at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: At 3-months
The BCSQ is comprised of 17-items to measure participants perception of lay birth companion support during labor. Research by Dunne et al., (2014) notes internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha is between .66-.76) and content and construct validity of the questionnaire (Dunne et al., 2014).
Change in Birth Companion Support Questionnaire at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum
The BCSQ is comprised of 17-items to measure participants perception of lay birth companion support during labor. Research by Dunne et al., (2014) notes internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha is between .66-.76) and content and construct validity of the questionnaire (Dunne et al., 2014).
The Perceived Wellness Scale
Time frame: At study enrollment
The perceived wellness scale is a 36-item measure designed to assess an individual's own perception of their wellness through physical, spiritual,intellectual, psychological, social and emotional dimensions. Research by Adams (1995) indicates the scale has high factorial, discriminant, convergent and face validity. It also had high consistency (a = .91), and test-retest reliability (r = .73 to .81) (Adams, 1995).
Change in the Perceived Wellness Scale at 1-month postpartum
Time frame: 1-month postpartum
The perceived wellness scale is a 36-item measure designed to assess an individual's own perception of their wellness through physical, spiritual,intellectual, psychological, social and emotional dimensions. Research by Adams (1995) indicates the scale has high factorial, discriminant, convergent and face validity. It also had high consistency (a = .91), and test-retest reliability (r = .73 to .81) (Adams, 1995).
Change in the Perceived Wellness Scale at 3-months postpartum
Time frame: 3-months postpartum
The perceived wellness scale is a 36-item measure designed to assess an individual's own perception of their wellness through physical, spiritual,intellectual, psychological, social and emotional dimensions. Research by Adams (1995) indicates the scale has high factorial, discriminant, convergent and face validity. It also had high consistency (a = .91), and test-retest reliability (r = .73 to .81) (Adams, 1995).
Change in the Perceived Wellness Scale at 6-months postpartum
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum.
The perceived wellness scale is a 36-item measure designed to assess an individual's own perception of their wellness through physical, spiritual,intellectual, psychological, social and emotional dimensions. Research by Adams (1995) indicates the scale has high factorial, discriminant, convergent and face validity. It also had high consistency (a = .91), and test-retest reliability (r = .73 to .81) (Adams, 1995).
City Birth Trauma Scale City Birth Trauma Scale
Time frame: At 1-month postpartum
The City Birth Trauma Scale is a 29-item questionnaire developed to measure birth-related PTSD according to DSM-5 criteria of: stressor criteria (A), symptoms of re-experiencing (B), avoidance (C), negative cognitions and mood (D), and hyperarousal (E), as well as duration of symptoms (F), significant distress or impairment (E), and exclusion criteria or other causes (H). It has a high alpha of .92 (Ayers et al., 2018).
Change in the City Birth Trauma Scale at 3-months postpartum City Birth Trauma Scale
Time frame: At 3-months postpartum
The City Birth Trauma Scale is a 29-item questionnaire developed to measure birth-related PTSD according to DSM-5 criteria of: stressor criteria (A), symptoms of re-experiencing (B), avoidance (C), negative cognitions and mood (D), and hyperarousal (E), as well as duration of symptoms (F), significant distress or impairment (E), and exclusion criteria or other causes (H). It has a high alpha of .92 (Ayers et al., 2018).
Change in the City Birth Trauma Scale at 6-months postpartum City Birth Trauma Scale
Time frame: At 6-months postpartum
The City Birth Trauma Scale is a 29-item questionnaire developed to measure birth-related PTSD according to DSM-5 criteria of: stressor criteria (A), symptoms of re-experiencing (B), avoidance (C), negative cognitions and mood (D), and hyperarousal (E), as well as duration of symptoms (F), significant distress or impairment (E), and exclusion criteria or other causes (H). It has a high alpha of .92 (Ayers et al., 2018).
Who can participate
This study lists these criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov. A study coordinator reviews eligibility during screening — this page does not determine whether you qualify.
Inclusion criteria
- Participants must be over the age of 18
- Currently pregnant and between 13 and 26 gestational weeks at the time of enrollment
- Live in a HRSA-designated rural area of Montana
Exclusion criteria
- They are under the age of 18
- Not currently pregnant
- Not between 13-26 gestational weeks at the time of enrollment
- If they do not live in a HRSA-designated rural are of Montana.
Where
- Missoula, Montana
Related conditions & keywords
Frequently asked questions
What is a clinical trial?
A clinical trial is a research study that tests new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or procedures to determine their safety and effectiveness. Trials are carefully designed and monitored to protect participants while advancing medical knowledge.
Is it safe to participate?
Clinical trials follow strict safety guidelines and ethical standards. Trials must be reviewed and approved, and participants are closely monitored by medical professionals throughout the study. You can withdraw at any time if you choose.
Will I be compensated?
Many clinical trials offer compensation for your time, travel expenses, and inconvenience. The specific compensation varies by study and will be discussed during the screening process. All study-related medical care is typically provided at no cost to participants.
Will I receive a placebo instead of treatment?
When effective treatment exists, participants typically receive either the standard treatment plus the study intervention, or the standard treatment plus placebo. You would not be denied effective care. Placebos are primarily used when no proven treatment is available, or in addition to standard care. Your trial consent form will clearly explain what treatments you may receive.
Can I leave a trial if I change my mind?
Absolutely. Participation in clinical trials is completely voluntary. You have the right to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason, without penalty or loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled.
How long does a clinical trial last?
Trial duration varies widely depending on the study design and purpose. Some trials last just a few weeks, while others may continue for months or years. The study coordinator will provide specific timeline information during your screening call.
Data: ClinicalTrials.gov · synced Aug 14, 2026 · Source of record for eligibility and locations