Patients are searching for this trial right now

This page is already ranking on Google. Activate it to start receiving pre-qualified patient leads directly in your inbox.

14-day free trial · $44/mo after · Cancel anytime · Money-back guarantee

NCT05923684 · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

NLP-Based Feedback to Improve Risk Comms and Informed Shared Decision Making

What this study is about

In this pilot study, the investigators will show feasibility of the NLP-based feedback system in 20 consultations of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The investigators will recruit from the practices of up to 10 physicians who typically see these patients.

View original scientific description

In this pilot study, the investigators will show feasibility of the NLP-based feedback system in 20 consultations of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. The investigators will recruit from the practices of up to 10 physicians who typically see these patients. The investigators will report the top five sentences from each consultation across key content areas (cancer prognosis, life expectancy, erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and irritative urinary symptoms) to both patients and physicians within 2 weeks of the consultation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

NLP-based Feedback

Audio recordings will be made using either digital recorders or telehealth platform-generated transcripts. Patient reports will include only the extracted sentences related to content areas. Physician reports will note the extracted statements across each content area, the quality scores for individual statements based on the pre-specified hierarchy, the statements that achieved the highest score across each content area, and feedback on what could be improved. For patients, decisional conflict and risk perception will be assessed before and after receiving the NLP-based feedback. For physicians, the investigators will assess baseline quality of risk communication by pre-specified hierarchy, any changes in individual physician communication over time, and accuracy of risk estimates for key content areas.

Primary outcome measures

Change in Decisional Conflict Scale Scores before and after intervention (patient-level outcome)

Time frame: Measured directly after treatment consultation and after NLP-based feedback given to patients within 2 weeks of consultation

The investigators will employ the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), to estimate uncertainty associated with treatment choice. Effect sizes of 0.3 to 0.4 are considered meaningful. Variability (standard deviation) in DCS scores before and after receiving NLP-based feedback will be assessed and used in planning a larger trial.

Change in risk perception before and after intervention (patient-level outcome)

Time frame: Measured directly after treatment consultation and after NLP -based feedback given to patients within 2 weeks of consultation

The investigators will evaluate concordance of cancer risk perception with actual cancer risk at the patient level before and after the intervention. Cancer risk perception will be assessed by multiple-choice questions. Concordance of patient answers with actual cancer risk as estimated by outcomes of the SPCG-4 randomized trial comparing surgery versus watchful waiting at the patient's PCCI-predicted life expectancy will be assessed as a binary outcome. Risk perception will be assessed before and after their consultation. Variability (standard deviation) in risk perception scores before and after receiving NLP-based feedback will be assessed and used in planning a larger trial.

Physician attitudes regarding integration of NLP-based information (physician-level outcome)

Time frame: Interviews will be conducted within 2 weeks of the intervention.

30-minute semi-structured interviews with counseling physicians will be conducted within 2 weeks of the intervention to obtain their opinions on the utility and ideal implementation strategy for the NLP-based feedback.

Difference between reported risk of side effects and prognosis with gold standard (physician-level outcome)

Time frame: Data will be captured during the treatment consultation-for the duration of the study up to 1 year

The difference in reported risk estimates given by physicians during the consultation as compared with the gold standards for these risks (i.e. for side effects, estimates from the CAESAR study; for cancer risk with and without treatment, risks of cancer mortality in the WW group of SPCG-4 trial at the patient's life expectancy as determined by the prostate cancer comorbidity index). Variability (standard deviation) in accuracy of estimates will be assessed and used in planning a larger trial. Accuracy of estimates for the interventional period will be compared with physician-specific historical references from a previously conducted trial using the standard of care (i.e. no NLP-based intervention).

Quality of composite physician risk communication score in treatment consultation (physician-level outcome)

Time frame: Data will be captured during the treatment consultation, for duration of the study up to 1 year

Quality of risk communication scores will be calculated by qualitatively analyzing treatment consultation transcripts to assess the highest quality of communication used to transmit information regarding all key tradeoffs (cancer prognosis, life expectancy, erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and irritative urinary symptoms). The quality of risk communication scale ranges from 0 to 5 for each outcome, with 0 representing the lowest score and 5 representing the highest score (Daskivich et al, J Urol 2022; Naser-Tavakolian et al, J Urol 2022). Scores for all key tradeoffs will be averaged to yield a composite quality of risk communication score. Variability (standard deviation) in quality scores will be assessed and used in planning a larger trial.

Patient attitudes regarding integration of NLP-based information

Time frame: within 4 weeks of patients using NLP system.

30-minute semi-structured interviews with patients will be conducted at the conclusion of the study period to obtain their opinions on the utility and ideal implementation strategy for the NLP-based feedback

Who can participate

This study lists these criteria on ClinicalTrials.gov. A study coordinator reviews eligibility during screening — this page does not determine whether you qualify.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men undergoing initial treatment consultation for clinically localized prostate cancer;
  • Men with upgraded prostate cancer on active surveillance considering conversion to definitive local therapy.
  • Cedars-Sinai patient.
  • Ability to read and write in English.

Exclusion criteria

  • Under 18 years of age;
  • Subjects with difficulty communicating or dementia;
  • Non-English speakers, given that our NLP-based tools cannot be used with languages other than English;
  • Men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer;
  • Men who have already been treated for clinically localized prostate cancer

Where

  • Los Angeles, California

Collaborators

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Related conditions & keywords

Prostate Cancerprostatecancerconsultationreviewfeedbacknaturalprocess

Frequently asked questions

What is a clinical trial?

A clinical trial is a research study that tests new medical treatments, drugs, devices, or procedures to determine their safety and effectiveness. Trials are carefully designed and monitored to protect participants while advancing medical knowledge.

Is it safe to participate?

Clinical trials follow strict safety guidelines and ethical standards. Trials must be reviewed and approved, and participants are closely monitored by medical professionals throughout the study. You can withdraw at any time if you choose.

Will I be compensated?

Many clinical trials offer compensation for your time, travel expenses, and inconvenience. The specific compensation varies by study and will be discussed during the screening process. All study-related medical care is typically provided at no cost to participants.

Will I receive a placebo instead of treatment?

When effective treatment exists, participants typically receive either the standard treatment plus the study intervention, or the standard treatment plus placebo. You would not be denied effective care. Placebos are primarily used when no proven treatment is available, or in addition to standard care. Your trial consent form will clearly explain what treatments you may receive.

Can I leave a trial if I change my mind?

Absolutely. Participation in clinical trials is completely voluntary. You have the right to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason, without penalty or loss of benefits to which you are otherwise entitled.

How long does a clinical trial last?

Trial duration varies widely depending on the study design and purpose. Some trials last just a few weeks, while others may continue for months or years. The study coordinator will provide specific timeline information during your screening call.

Data: ClinicalTrials.gov · synced Aug 1, 2025 · Source of record for eligibility and locations

📊
1 of 30 participants interested
3% interest

See if this study fits

A short prescreen based on this study's listed criteria. A coordinator confirms eligibility — this is not a medical assessment.

Preparing your pre-screening questions…

Study locations

Choose your preferred location, or select flexible during enrollment.

RECRUITING

Los Angeles

California

Location available

Express your interest

Share your contact details and a study coordinator can follow up about screening.

Secure & Confidential

Your information is protected and will only be shared with the research team.

What participation can include

  • Study-related care provided by the research team
  • Close monitoring by medical professionals
  • Possible compensation for time and travel*
  • The option to withdraw at any time
  • Contributing to medical research that may help future patients

*Compensation varies by study. Confirm details with coordinator.

Typical next steps

  1. 1.Submit this form
  2. 2.Phone screening
  3. 3.In-person assessment if eligible
  4. 4.Begin participation

Find More Prostate Cancer Trials by City

Browse all prostate cancer clinical trials in these cities — not just this study.

Browse More Trials by Condition

Looking for Prostate Cancer Treatment in Los Angeles?

Join others in California exploring innovative treatment options through clinical research

Prostate Cancer Treatment Options in Los Angeles, California

If you're searching for Prostate Cancer treatment in Los Angeles, participating in a clinical research study may provide access to innovative approaches under expert medical supervision. This study is actively recruiting participants in Los Angeles and surrounding areas.

Clinical trials offer participants the opportunity to receive cutting-edge treatments while contributing to medical research that may help future patients with Prostate Cancer. All study-related care is provided at no cost to participants.

Local Sites
1 locations in California
Now Enrolling
Up to 30 participants
Quick Start
Screening available now

Why Consider a Clinical Trial for Prostate Cancer?

Potential Benefits

  • Access to new treatment approaches before public availability
  • Close monitoring by experienced medical professionals
  • Study-related care provided at no cost
  • Contribute to medical research for Prostate Cancer

What to Expect

  • Initial screening to determine eligibility
  • Regular check-ups and monitoring visits
  • Possible compensation for time and travel
  • You can withdraw at any time

Frequently Asked Questions About This Prostate Cancer Study

Important Clinical Trial Information

This information is provided for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial participation involves potential risks and benefits. Eligibility requirements apply and will be assessed during the screening process.

Study identifier: NCT05923684. For complete study details, visit ClinicalTrials.gov. Always consult with your healthcare provider before making decisions about your medical care or participating in clinical research.